Steven Freeman was born on January 1, 1995, in Thomaston, Georgia, but it was the nearby town of Griffin where his life truly began to unfold. Raised in a warm, close-knit family, Steven and his brother grew up surrounded by unwavering support. Their parents didn’t just provide for their basic needs—they cultivated a home filled with love, encouragement, and resilience.
Steven’s childhood was marked by happiness. He was that kid with the easy smile, the kind spirit, and the energy that lit up a room. Friends came naturally, drawn to his optimism and laughter. If there was a trail to hike or a lake to fish, you’d find Steven Freeman there—nature was his sanctuary.
Among the people who knew and loved him, none shared a bond with Steven Freeman quite like his mother. When she made the decision to return to school, Steven’s pride was profound. After her graduation, he penned a heartfelt letter praising her strength and sacrifices—a lasting symbol of his appreciation and emotional depth.
Mary Catherine Higdon: The Girl Who Shared His World
During high school, Steven Freeman met Mary Catherine Higdon. A year older, she shared his love of the outdoors, and their connection was immediate. Whether they were camping with friends or fishing together, Mary Catherine proved she wasn’t just a companion—she was a partner. Confident around nature and firearms, she easily became part of Steven’s inner circle. Their bond only grew, strengthened by shared values and years of togetherness.
Mary Catherine had a spark of her own—bright, lively, and imaginative. From childhood, she thrived in the spotlight at family gatherings and adored animals. The two of them complemented each other in nearly every way.
After graduation, Steven Freeman began working for a roofing company. Mary Catherine took a job as a kindergarten assistant. They moved in together, establishing a home on Sunnybrook Drive. By 2018, they had spent nearly a decade as a couple—through ups, downs, and even a short separation. Despite some tension, they always found their way back.
Mary Catherine became part of Steven’s family traditions. She was a Sunday dinner regular, and holidays were celebrated side by side. Steven’s mother viewed her almost like a daughter. They weren’t just dating—they were building a life.
The Night Everything Changed
August 1, 2018, began like any other. But by nightfall, their home was engulfed in flashing emergency lights.
Around 11:00 PM, a panicked call came into 911. On the line was Mary Catherine, sobbing uncontrollably. She told dispatchers that Steven Freeman had been shot—that it was an accident. She said she didn’t know the gun was loaded. She had been handing it to him when it suddenly went off.
When authorities arrived, they found Steven Freeman on a mattress in the living room. Mary Catherine was beside him, hysterical and refusing to move. Paramedics worked quickly, noting a faint pulse, and rushed him to the hospital. But the scene remained chaotic. Mary Catherine couldn’t stop crying. She kept repeating that she didn’t mean to do it.
The bullet had struck Steven Freeman just below the neck. As investigators began their work, Mary Catherine’s story remained the same: she never meant to hurt him. She insisted the gun fired on its own. That it had all happened in a split second—a tragic mistake.
But even in those early moments, the question lingered: was this truly an accident? Or something else entirely?
Despite doctors’ best efforts, the damage to Steven Freeman’s body was irreversible. Just before midnight on August 1, 2018, he was pronounced dead at the hospital. Back at the scene, Mary Catherine Higdon was inconsolable—but the responding officers were already uneasy. Her version of events didn’t seem to align with the physical evidence inside the home.
Inside the kitchen, chaos. Food littered the floor and countertops, as if a heated confrontation had boiled over moments before the shooting. It wasn’t just untidy—it looked violent. The disorder suggested more than an accident. Something had exploded—emotionally, physically—just before that fatal gunshot rang out.
Officers also caught the sharp scent of alcohol on Mary Catherine’s breath. Her words were muddled at times, her statements hard to follow. Despite her shock and visible distress, police made the call to bring her in for questioning. She didn’t resist. She got in the car and went willingly.
Read more The Devil in New Hampshire: The Sheila LaBarre Case
The Interrogation Begins
At the station, Mary Catherine remained consistent—at first. She said it was an accident. She loved Steven. She would never harm him intentionally. She emphasized their shared love of hunting and their comfort with guns. According to her, all their firearms were always kept unloaded. She insisted she was stunned when the gun discharged.
But then, a small detail changed everything.
While recounting the moment of the shooting, Mary Catherine said something different. This time, she claimed, “When I threw the gun to Steven, it fired.” It was a slip—one word that contradicted her earlier version, where she said she had simply handed him the weapon.
That single sentence raised alarm bells. Throwing a firearm? Loaded or not, it was a reckless act—especially from someone like Mary Catherine, who wasn’t just a casual gun user. She had experience. She worked at a gun store. She regularly handled firearms and had even trained others.
Mary Catherine wasn’t a novice. At the gun shop, she was known for her technical knowledge. She often claimed to know more than Steven Freeman himself. For someone with that background, throwing a gun was unthinkable. Investigators knew it. And now, they had reason to doubt nearly everything she had said.
Detectives shifted their tone. They laid out the contradictions—the mess in the kitchen, the smell of alcohol, the changing statements. They confronted her. They told her they didn’t buy the accident story.
Mary Catherine began to cry again. And according to investigators, in that emotionally charged moment, she confessed: she had pulled the trigger during an argument.
The Crucial Evidence That Wasn’t
But there was a problem. A devastating one.
The interrogation had been recorded—video and audio. Yet when investigators reviewed the tape, the audio was corrupted. A continuous electronic buzz obscured her words. The moment she allegedly confessed was lost.
Her strongest admission… couldn’t be used.
Despite this, the investigation moved forward. Mary Catherine Higdon was arrested and charged with murder. Prosecutors believed they still had a case.
Prosecutors emphasized Mary Catherine’s experience with firearms. They argued this wasn’t a tragic mishandling—it was deliberate. They pointed to the inconsistencies in her statements. They pointed to the condition of the gun, which was greased and prepared—suggesting it wasn’t just lying around by accident.
They even highlighted the details of that evening: Mary Catherine had made roast beef, Steven’s favorite meal. It could’ve been a peaceful night. But then food was flung across the kitchen. Tempers flared. And a shot was fired.
Behind Closed Doors
As the case grew, so did the portrait of the relationship behind the scenes. Friends of Steven Freeman were vocal. And, surprisingly, not one of them seemed shocked by what had happened.
Several said Steven had told them about past incidents—how Mary Catherine had pointed guns at him before. It wasn’t the first time.
What began as a passionate young relationship had slowly eroded into something darker. Friends recalled her erratic behavior, her possessiveness, and the public scenes she would cause. She had yelled at Steven in public, pushed him, berated him. Their arguments had become routine. Peace was the exception, not the norm.
As the months wore on, Steven Freeman found himself retreating more and more from the life he had once built with Mary Catherine Higdon. The warmth and connection they had shared in high school had eroded, replaced by volatility and fear. Friends noticed it. So did coworkers.
Steven began leaving the apartment frequently—just to breathe. He blocked her number repeatedly, but each time, she found a way back in. A coworker later recalled how Mary Catherine had once called him thirty times before his shift even began. And that wasn’t a one-off—it had become a pattern.
On April 21, 2018, Steven texted a friend in panic. Mary Catherine, he said, was running around their apartment, screaming—threatening to shoot herself, and him.
But that wasn’t the scariest message.
Weeks later, he sent another chilling update. She had pointed guns at him before, but this time, something was different. “There’s something in her eyes,” he wrote. For the first time, Steven truly believed she could go through with it. The look in her eyes terrified him.
Read more Giovanni Padovani: From Lover to Killer
The Quiet Escape Plan
That fear finally drove him to a decision: he had to get out.
Steven Freeman made plans to leave the relationship once and for all. A friend had agreed to be his roommate in a different city. He was going to wait until Mary Catherine was at work, gather his things, and disappear without confrontation. His escape was scheduled for August 3.
But on August 1, he was shot.
Though he never filed an official police report, law enforcement had been to their residence five times in the prior year. Domestic disputes were common.
Still, two days before the shooting, their messages seemed tender. On July 30, Steven and Mary Catherine exchanged loving texts. But by July 31, everything unraveled again. Another argument—maybe the final straw. Steven Freeman didn’t return home that night. He stayed with a friend instead, cutting contact with her completely. He even told his mother he had no plans to go back.
August 1 began with unanswered calls. Mary Catherine cooked roast beef—Steven’s favorite—perhaps hoping to reset the evening. But Steven Freeman didn’t respond. He was done.
Desperate for answers, she contacted his mother, who told her Steven had stayed at his friend Thomas’s house. Mary Catherine didn’t wait. She drove around and spotted Thomas’s vehicle on the road—Steven in the passenger seat.
She pulled up beside them, shouting through the window, demanding to know if he was coming home. Steven Freeman finally agreed. Weary, he gave in—perhaps just to avoid another scene.
Two hours later, he was bleeding out in the living room.
The Trial Begins
When the case went to trial, prosecutors sought to prove that Steven Freeman’s death was no accident. They painted a picture of a young man planning to leave a toxic relationship—and a girlfriend who couldn’t let him go.
Their theory: she made his favorite meal, waited for him, and when he didn’t return, snapped. Rage and rejection ignited something dangerous.
The prosecution presented more than just theories.
- Greasy fingerprints on the gun showed it had been handled deliberately.
- Bloodstains on one side of the mattress indicated Steven Freeman had been sitting upright when shot, then collapsed backward in place.
One by one, witnesses stepped forward—friends, coworkers, even family. All told similar stories. Mary Catherine had threatened Steven Freeman before, sometimes with a gun. She had screamed at him in public, pushed him, and isolated him.
Even more damaging: she had altered her story not once, but six times. Each version contradicted the last.
But as the courtroom drama unfolded, Mary Catherine’s version of events changed entirely.
This time, it wasn’t an accident. It wasn’t a tragic mishandling of a weapon.
Now, she said it was self-defense.
A New Accusation
Her legal team unveiled a drastically different portrait of Steven Freeman. No longer the cheerful outdoorsman everyone admired, they claimed he was controlling, jealous, and violent.
Mary Catherine’s attorney alleged Steven Freeman:
- Told her what to wear.
- Monitored her spending.
- Demanded to know her location at all times.
The defense even described alleged instances of physical abuse—saying Steven Freeman had struck her on the head and once kicked her so hard off their bed that she hit a doorframe.
It was a jarring reversal—and one that would come under intense scrutiny.
As the defense built its case, they introduced a key piece of evidence—63 pages of text messages. The tone of the messages was unmistakable: angry, vulgar, and in parts, threatening. These weren’t recent; they had been recovered from an old phone and dated back nearly a year, during a short breakup when Mary Catherine had slept with one of Steven’s friends.
The betrayal had hit Steven Freeman hard, and in his rage, he had sent a flurry of furious messages. The defense used these messages to paint a picture of emotional volatility and alleged abuse—fuel for their claim that Steven had a darker side hidden behind his public image.
Mary Catherine Takes the Stand
When Mary Catherine Higdon stepped into the witness box, the courtroom fell silent. Tearfully, she began to describe what she claimed life with Steven Freeman had really been like.
According to her, every day followed strict routines. She said she was expected to prepare his clothes and shoes in a precise manner and have the bathroom ready for his warm morning shower. She claimed Steven Freeman constantly accused her of cheating, and their arguments often turned physical—grabbing, shaking, hitting.
She described “the Red Room,” which she claimed referred to nights when Steven Freeman allegedly tied her up and struck her. Through sobs, she spoke of two incidents in which, she said, Steven had forced himself on her. One, she claimed, occurred after a trip to Disneyland, when Steven allegedly told her that since he’d spent money on her, he deserved something in return.
According to Mary Catherine, the night of the shooting wasn’t about rage—it was about fear.
She testified that she had told Steven she wanted to end their relationship. In response, he allegedly began throwing the dinner she had made for him and shoving her. That’s when, she said, she grabbed the gun and demanded that he leave.
She claimed Steven Freeman lunged toward her. The weapon fired.
She never meant to shoot, she told the jury. It all happened in a flash.
Inconsistencies and Missing Reports
But the prosecution wasn’t convinced.
They pointed out that during her original interview, Mary Catherine had never said Steven lunged at her. She hadn’t mentioned physical abuse, control, or sexual assault. There were no police complaints, no hospital records, no witnesses.
Why now?
Mary Catherine responded that she had felt ashamed. She blamed herself for the way Steven Freeman treated her and said she believed if she just acted differently, he might stop.
Then came a surprise—this time from the prosecution.
Data retrieved from Mary Catherine’s phone showed she had visited adult websites featuring violent content just hours before the shooting. She had made those searches while babysitting, with Steven nowhere nearby.
To prosecutors, this undermined her claims of trauma.
Mary Catherine, however, insisted that she had searched those sites only to learn how to satisfy Steven Freeman. She claimed she wasn’t interested in the content herself.
Two Sides of a Syndrome
The defense’s closing argument centered around battered woman syndrome. A psychologist testified that Mary Catherine’s behavior aligned with someone trapped in a long-term cycle of abuse.
But the prosecution countered with their own expert—one who flatly rejected that diagnosis. In their view, nothing about Mary Catherine’s demeanor or actions pointed to the syndrome. The arguments were emotional, polarizing, and deeply contested.
One detail loomed large.
Mary Catherine claimed she had told Steven Freeman she wanted to break up. But on the day he died, she had spent the day trying to reach him, cooked his favorite meal, and then drove around town to find him when he didn’t respond.
This, the prosecution argued, was not the behavior of someone trying to escape a toxic relationship—it looked more like reconciliation.
Despite the mounting questions, major flaws in the investigation persisted.
- The audio from Mary Catherine’s recorded interview—where she allegedly confessed—was corrupted. It couldn’t be used.
- The gun found near Steven had been removed from its original position without documentation. Officers had placed it in a bag, fearing Mary Catherine might harm herself, but never took photographs to preserve the crime scene.
Why they didn’t just escort her from the room remains unanswered.
Read more The Murder of Margaret Sumney: A Mother Betrayed
The Verdict
After a trial that exposed two very different versions of the same relationship, the jury was left to decide.
Four hours after beginning deliberations, they returned with their decision.
Mary Catherine Higdon was acquitted of all charges.
After the trial concluded, some jurors came forward with quiet admissions. Though several of them believed Mary Catherine Higdon may have been responsible for Steven Freeman’s death, they said the prosecution hadn’t met the burden of proof.
They pointed to glaring gaps: the missing audio from Mary Catherine’s interrogation, the failure to photograph the crime scene properly, the poorly documented firearm handling, and—perhaps most critically—the absence of data from Steven’s own phone. Without access to his messages or records, the jury only had one full account to consider: Mary Catherine’s.
It wasn’t enough.
On June 26, 2019, Mary Catherine Higdon walked out of jail. Acquitted. Legally exonerated.
But while the court had spoken, the pain was just beginning for those Steven left behind.
His family sat in stunned silence when the verdict was read. For them, the trial had not delivered justice—only another kind of loss.
A Mother’s Mission
Among the most heartbroken was Steven’s mother. But in the wake of her son’s death, she chose not to disappear into grief. Instead, she became a voice.
She began speaking out about domestic violence—not just as it’s typically seen, but as it’s often overlooked. She reminded the public that abuse doesn’t always fit a stereotype. It can be loud or quiet, physical or emotional. It can happen to women. But it can also happen to men.
And it happened to Steven.
Today, Steven Freeman’s name is more than just a memory—it’s part of a growing conversation. His story is a reminder that violence knows no gender. That victims come in all forms. And that sometimes, silence—especially from male victims—is what lets the cycle continue.
His life, and the circumstances of his death, now echo through advocacy, awareness, and a mother’s fight to change what justice too often overlooks.
